SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] SS Club Competition - Going for the Gavel

Subject: [SECC] SS Club Competition - Going for the Gavel
From: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:37:03 -0400
On Oct 20, 2005, at 6:36 AM, Hal Kennedy wrote:

> Here are a few ideas the more advanced planners are putting forward:
>
> 1.  Two operators at good stations.  If you have at least a tribander
> and wires for 40/80, consider inviting someone over and using both
> calls.  The better operator stays on the high bands during the day and
> the low bands at night using his own call.  The other operator, using
> his own call, stays on 40 and 80 during the day and 20 at night.  Two
> good scores can come from one station this way and it's perfectly  
> legal,
> provided each entrant uses a separate and distinct transmitter.   
> Even if
> someone can only drop by for an hour or two - coming on the bands late
> in the contest as 'fresh meat' can produce tremendous rates and a good
> score in a short time.  See #2.

This is a good strategy for unlimited category competition -- when  
the number of logs isn't constrained to 50.

> 2. A study done at another club shows a good op can get 40-50% of the
> top winning score in about 10 hours.  I suspect you can get a very
> helpful score for the club in one hour of operating.  ALL SCORES ARE
> WELCOME!!!

Indeed. The first 5-8 hours of SS can be extremely productive.

> 3.  There is a concept called HMO - highly motivated operator -  
> which is
> discussed in length in the last issue of NCJ.  This practice lead the
> NCCC to two SS gavels.  HMOs are ops who
> give up a chance at personal glory to aid the club score by  
> operating at
> two locations under two calls.  Two ops can operate half the  
> contest at
> home under their own calls, travel to each other's stations and get on
> the air using a different call.  This is legal as long as 'as-yet
> unused' transmitters and amps are turned on for the operation under  
> the
> second callsign.

Again, this is a good strategy for the unlimited category competition.

For the Medium category, we'd do well to have more people operate.
> Some of the above may be more than any of us have the motivation  
> for - I
> don't know - fortunately, it's not required for us to win as a  
> club.  As
> Bill points out, SECC was only a few QSOs short of being the top
> mid-sized club last year.

12% higher score would have done it.

>   We can win this if each of us who get on
> regularly operates just a little more in SS, and those who have lost
> interest simply flip on the rig for an hour and submit their score.

In my opinion, we want more than a bunch of 1 hour logs. If we have  
51 logs, then we move up a category with the big boys who have us way  
outgunned.

> See you in SS!  FT CW here, and at least PT but hopefully FT in SSB.

I'm working on a spreadsheet to see how we're doing on log slots. I  
don't want to jerrymander the log submissions, but I do want to track  
it.


Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>