On Apr 26, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Dan/W4NTI wrote:
> You know something guys? That really is a low move from the ARRL.
>
> I hate to say it but, maybe Baxter has a point.
I agree that Ed has a point, but it also represents something of a
quandary for the ARRL.
Since the Amateur Service is supposed to be self-policing -- would it
be right for the ARRL to hold back this information, when it clearly
shows someone operating a station out of his licensing limits? To what
length should your ARRL dues to spend in order to protect the privacy
rights of such a violator?
It's a real catch-22 situation if I ever saw one. The ARRL loses either
way.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
|