On 29 Oct 2004 at 4:28, K4SB wrote:
> I must admit that I can not understand why someone has to vote "no".
> At every election of Officers of the Club for at least the last 5
> years, the vote has been unanimous.
I feel the office of treasurer is inconsistent with the
original intent of the SECC...as we recently discussed here
on the reflector. *To me*, it was important that someone
voted no.
Notice that the voter turnout for the circle moving
question was much lower. I (and I presume many others) had
no strong feelings on this issue one way or the other.
Ditto on the election of officers.
It's no biggie...
--
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
Cornelia, Georgia
"Have Dobro Will Travel"
|