SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] 40M Bandplan <was> CQWW RTTY Results

Subject: [SECC] 40M Bandplan <was> CQWW RTTY Results
From: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan)
Date: Tue Sep 28 09:49:31 2004
>From ARRL, ( http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html )

40 Meters (7.0-7.3 MHz):
7.040 RTTY DX 
7.080-7.100 RTTY 

I was working guys above 7.04, found a run freq ~7.048, and 7.052 (where I
was jammed by a cw type)

How much lower in frequency were guys going?

73
Jon
K9JS




PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material
protected by state and federal law. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use by other persons or entities is strictly
prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or
an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, kindly
contact the sender and delete the material, including any attachments, in
any form and from any computer.



-----Original Message-----
From: AE4Y [mailto:ae4y@mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 4:10 PM
To: SECC
Subject: Re: [SECC] CQWW RTTY Results


I believe that it's primarily due to the fact that the Europeans have to 
operate down there on RTTY.  If you want to work them, you gotta call 
them where they're listening.

Kent, AE4Y

Daniel Jeswald wrote:

> Why does RTTY advocates think it is alright, cool or whatever to run that
> mode ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE BOTTOM END OF FORTY METERS?  I am really
> getting sick and tired of it.
> 
> Dan/W4NTI

_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>