SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Re: A long post

Subject: [SECC] Re: A long post
From: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Mon Sep 6 20:36:06 2004
If folks are not participating in the club, then why keep them in the club?
We need members that actually put in scores.  If it comes down to the Tenn
stations are not 'helping' then we don't need them.  That is my opinion.

Dan/W4NTI  (Alabama)



> [Original Message]
> From: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
> To: <secc@contesting.com>
> Date: 9/4/04 9:37:35 AM
> Subject: [SECC] Re: A long post
>
> I think Lee wrote the first part below.
>
> > > I'm  all for keeping "dead wood" on the roster that may only
> > > submit a score once every three years.  That way their
> > > points go in the aggregate, otherwise we get nothing.
>
> With all due respect to Lee, this is not a good idea. It only
> increases the workload of those trying to drum up support, and makes
> maintaining a Club roster an impossible task.
> Why is it so difficult to have a "good idea" of whom we can expect a
> couple of scores each year.
>
> And Bill Coleman wrote:
>  
> > Maybe so. Of course, there are folks who have moved out of the circle
> > without informing us, who can't really contribute scores now anyway.
>
> There are also folks who are in the circle who have not contributed
> scores to the SECC, but to Clubs in the area they live. I think every
> TN member falls into this category.
> I'd have to run my program, but on the theory that they could be
> eliminated, it would result in a significant shift to the South and
> South East which may result in picking up
> SECC members who are not currently in the circle.
>
> And, just for the record, Bill has done one hell of fine job!
>
> 73
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [SECC] Re: A long post, Daniel Jeswald <=