SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Locals worked - 160 test

Subject: [SECC] Locals worked - 160 test
From: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Dec 8 15:37:57 2003
 Wouldn't it mostly eliminate those in TN , who are all in the TCG now anyway ??
 We want to move it to the south and maybe east - but not too far east becuase
 we want K4NO and others around the Huntsville area. As far as I know we have 
 no active members in TN or Western NC ??? We also want to make sure we don't 
lose anyone in SC....

                           Jeff


> 
> From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
> Date: 2003/12/08 Mon AM 08:25:03 EST
> To: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>,  "SECC" <secc@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Locals worked - 160 test
> 
> On 12/7/03 8:47 PM, Hal Kennedy at halken@comcast.net wrote:
> 
> >I don't know when SECC last looked at their circle, but some clubs move
> >theirs fairly often - something to consider.
> 
> The basic problem is, we have members at each edge of the circle. Moving 
> it would mean excluding someone.
> 
> K4SB did some analysis a couple of years ago, looking at this very issue. 
> There appeared to be no advantage to moving the circle -- it would 
> eliminate as many as it would include.
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
>             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>