Is there any requirement for attending eyeball meetings to maintain
membership in SECC?
Dan/W4NTI
----- Original Message -----
From: "K4SB" <k4sb@earthlink.net>
To: <secc@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004
> > W4DD writes:
> > > Perhaps voting on line for future issues is the answer. Seems like
the
> > > hamfest attendance is too thin.
> ----------------------------
> If the attendance is too thin, it's not the fault of those who did
> attend. While I support the idea that one's family comes first, I am
> getting a little tired of the excuses; wife's family in town, going
> shopping, ad nausem. If you can't spare 2 hours per year to support
> the SECC, perhaps you should consider your value to the SECC.
>
> And, I don't think online voting is approved in the Constitution and
> bylaws, and
>
> You must have at least 4 affirmative members to even ask the officers
> to consider the idea. Considering that at least 3 of our present
> officers were present at the meeting and voted for the measure, I'd
> say you have an uphill fight.
>
> Then there's the problem of "members in good standing". Our rules
> require log submissions for at least 2 contests per year.
>
> Anyone want to open that can of worms?
>
> 73
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
|