Yea, its enough. They don't look at your summary anyway. They compute
your score, so don't worry if CT scored a mult wrong. It don't matter.
73
Bill
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 n4uk@mindspring.com wrote:
> Bill, my logs for both were sent in last week. I do have a question
> though. Even though both sponsors say that the Cabrillo summary is
> good enough I noted that it really isn't a summary as it does not
> break down how many qsos and how many mults and qso points were
> worked. Is the Cabrillo summary good enough for the major contests?
> Anyone have any problems with this after submitting a log. I was, and
> still am, a little worried about this. Or maybe that's the whole
> purpose of the Cabrillo robot. To do all of this stuff
> automatically??? N4UK "Bill Fisher, W4AN" <w4an@contesting.com> wrote:
> > While most of you are off due to snow or ice, it might be a good
> time to get those logs in.
>
> CQWW CW is due January 15th --------------------------- Send them to
> CW@CQWW.COM
>
>
> ARRL 160 is due January 8th --------------------------- Send them to
> 160meter@arrl.org
>
>
> Both require Cabrillo format.
>
> 73
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> --
> SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
>
>
>
> --
> SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
>
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|