SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] RE: [SEDXC] CQWW 160 CW Contest

Subject: [SECC] RE: [SEDXC] CQWW 160 CW Contest
From: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:02:12 +0000
Jay Pryor wrote:
> Hey guys, SEDXC puts emphasis on the 160M contest; not on 10M.  I am not
> aware of a request from SEDXC for SECC members to sent in its scores to
> SEDXC.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> I think I'm as collaborative as the next guy but my score in the 10M and
> all contests other than 160M are going to SECC.
> 73,
> Jay, K4OGG

I believe the 2 Clubs are not compatible in their design. It's all
fine about joining, but just how members of the SECC can stand the
drive to a Club meeting? It's a 2 hour drive for me, and I can think
of better ways to torture myself than getting on I-285 at 5:30.

I really believe some more thought be put into this area. If you
discount the dual members, the SEDXC has done absolutely nothing to
support the contests we get in, such as the GA QSO Party.

My score for 160 will go to the SECC.

73
Ed

--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>