RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

To: Jeff Rinehart <jmrinehart@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum
From: Bostjan Voncina - S55O <bostjan.voncina@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:58:21 +0200
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Why dont we just put a space between the second cq?
Cq s55o s55o c q

Doesnt look neat but it does solve all the problems mentioned before ;)

Regarda
Ian  - Bostjan s55o
Dne 27. mar. 2016 17:00 je "Jeff Rinehart via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
napisal/-a:

> Ok - so don't use QRZ - got that - Test is too long -  got that too.  So,
> if we don't use CQ and Test is too long, what is the alternative other than
> just waiting for the Skimmer folks to figure it out?
> I don't use Skimmer myself but I can appreciate it's value.  Whether or
> not a person uses Skimmer isn't the issue if I understand it right.  It's
> this thing of Skimmer picking up CQ just in front of a S&P'ers callsign and
> then posting that on the cluster as someone's Run frequency when actually
> that callsign should only be associated with the S&P'er.  Am I still
> confused?  or just Dense!  I Do want to operate correctly even though I am
> just a Little Pistol providing contacts for the Big Boys!  I am posting
> this because there are, no doubt, lots of others out there reading this who
> are just too shy to say anything.  de W4PJW
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>