RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition

To: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition
From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:30 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The guys keying into the K3 are slow - especially if they make a mistake on sending their SN. But my hope is that after playing with the toy-K3 keying method, they get seduced by RTTY contesting and start using a proper setup. At least that's my hope.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: Ian White
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 10:42 AM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Cc: 'John Barber'
Subject: Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition

GW4SKA wrote:
6 seconds between CQs is a long time. 2.5 to 3 seconds is plenty.
In a big contest you could lose your run frequency in 6 seconds
!!!!!!!!!!

In a big CW contest, maybe, but in RTTY we usually get a few seconds
more [1].

However, there does seem to be an ever-widening gap between the serious
RTTY contesters and the much larger number of casual datamode operators.
I'm getting increasingly impatient with the long stretches of "dead air"
that some operators always leave before coming back (what are they doing
in this time?) and then it's always with a relatively low serial number.


But worst of all are those painful, limping QSOs with people who are
very obviously using a Morse key into a K3/KX3. One hates to discourage
them... but...



[1] "Me and My Run Frequency" - http://tinyurl.com/hdt9wrm


73 from Ian GM3SEK


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>