To: | "reflector RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands |
From: | "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Dave Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:06:25 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Why do RTTY ops even put a "cq" at the end of their cq message?CW ops never put a CQ at the end (except for a few newbie converts from RTTY). 45 Baud RTTY is 60 wpm, a lot faster than contest CW, so it's not like we had to wait so long for the call sign that we forgot that it was a CQ. Since RTTY Skimmers are increasingly powerful and popular, and are getting confused by the cq at the end, maybe it's time to just drop that final cq. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] CRLF, John Holmes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands, Don AA5AU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands, Jeff Stai |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands, Don AA5AU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |