RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands

To: "reflector RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands
From: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:06:25 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Why do RTTY ops even put a "cq" at the end of their cq message?

CW ops never put a CQ at the end (except for a few newbie converts from RTTY). 45 Baud RTTY is 60 wpm, a lot faster than contest CW, so it's not like we had to wait so long for the call sign that we forgot that it was a CQ.

Since RTTY Skimmers are increasingly powerful and popular, and are getting confused by the cq at the end, maybe it's time to just drop that final cq.

Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
Yuma, AZ

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>