RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY
From: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:40:05 +0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Tom, they went through all of this last year on the rtty reflector--some one contacted the powers to be and they said that "would check in to it"-- heard nothing since...until after the test and the same thread will kick in again IMO , a dumb rule-- if you are not going to submit any logs to them,,,, Id run it at 100 wts wid amp-- I run my 590 at 55 wts or so in rtty tests this mostly in s&p
gl 73 john
On 7/13/2015 4:26 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
There had been some talk in the past about allowing the use of amplifiers in the NAQP RTTY test since lots of radios can't run 100 watts key down for long periods of time.

I know my TS-450's won't run 100 watts continuously on RTTY so I have the choice of running higher power and take a chance of frying the radio or doing what the manual says and run 40 - 45 watts. Yeah I know - buy new radios. Not gonna happen :-)

With all the 200 and 400 watt radios out there, this rule seems moot. Is someone with a 200 or 400 watt radio less likely to cheat than someone with an amp set to 100 watts? Just curious about the rationale for the rule. 73
Tom W7WHY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>