RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results

To: John GW4SKA <ska@bartg.org.uk>, "rtty-contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results
From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:39:29 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:52 AM, John GW4SKA <ska@bartg.org.uk> wrote:
> Isn't that wonderful.
>
> All the clever programmers and top end PCs can't be made to work as well as
> a 70 years old machine.
>
> So BARTG should change the rules ????????????
>
> John GW4SKA
> (writing personally and not with BARTG hat on)


Also callsigns.  Those should go, too, because a lot of times people
copy them wrong.  Did you know that some of the foreign ones you
letters and numbers in different orders!  Too hard!

RST is, fortunately, already gone from BARTG, which is good because a
LOT of people get that wrong on teletype.  Also, some people don't
remember what frequency they are on (you know how it is, change band,
go oil the gears, come back, forget to write new band in log) so
therefore band isn't idiot-proof and it needs to go.

Let's see, what does that leave?  Frequency not needed, nor the other
guy's callsign, and certainly not an exchange.  That should be it.
What else would be needed?  I mean stuff that's idiot proof?




-- 
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>