RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] GRITTY

To: <ed@w0yk.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] GRITTY
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:11:58 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Agreed!
73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Ed Muns Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 11:03 AM To: rtty@contesting.com Subject: Re: [RTTY] GRITTY
Agreed, although I ponder whether it would be "good" for RTTY contesting.
Part of the skill, and fun, is quickly using multiple decoder windows to
decide if there is good copy.  Just like the CW contester has to decide if
the code he heard in the QRM and noise is good copy.  OTOH, smartly
combining the outputs of multiple decoders is just another, hopefully
"better", decoder.  And, the basic premise of RTTY is that decoder
technology is used rather than the human brain.

Ed W0YK

On 2015-04-12 12:51 PM, Joe W4TV wrote:
The true breakthrough in RTTY decoding will come when some
smart programmer takes multiple copies of 2Tone (with
different profiles)plus multiple copies of MMTTY (with
different profiles) and GRITTY, eliminates the low confidence
decodes and integrates the resulting "clean" data into a
single interface.  That will free the user from constantly
scanning multiple decoder windows and mousing from decoder
to decoder to capture calls/reports.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>