On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:
> On 2015-04-12 12:31 PM, Ed Muns wrote:
>
>> Then, after encountering a wider variety of band and signal and
>> activity conditions, I had to conclude that each decoder is superior
>> in certain specific situations. The value of using multiple,
>> different and parallel decoders is clear. Perhaps GRITTY will become
>> an additional valuable decoder.
>>
>
> The true breakthrough in RTTY decoding will come when some smart
> programmer takes multiple copies of 2Tone (with different profiles)
> plus multiple copies of MMTTY (with different profiles) and GRITTY,
> eliminates the low confidence decodes and integrates the resulting
> "clean" data into a single interface. That will free the user from
> constantly scanning multiple decoder windows and mousing from decoder
> to decoder to capture calls/reports.
>
As a first step, I'd settle for the current decoders finding a way to
display the confidence level metadata along with the text. How about
underscoring for high confidence?
That said, for me part of the fun and skill is using what I hear to
establish my own confidence levels.
73 jeff wk6i
--
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|