RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21
From: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:51:47 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The reason nobody sends CQ at the end of a CQ transmission in a CW contest is because the stations working the CQer don't send their call in their exchange transmission, hence no confusion as to who is CQing. For those tuning the band instead of the internet in a RTTY contest, there can be great confusion as to "whose frequency" it is when you see a call sign, especially since a complete contest exchange sometimes does not even contain the CQers call sign; thus a CQ after the CQers call sign in the confirmation by the CQer is desirable, as well as at the end of a new CQ transmission.

Dave, K2YG



On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Dave Hachadorian<k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
wrote:

...
>
>But CW contest have been going on for 87 years, and nobody puts CQ at the
>end.  There is no confusion.....

>
>The CQ at the end is now more of a hindrance than a help, at least for
>those contests that allow Telnet assistance, which is the majority of RTTY
>contests.
>
>Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
>Yuma, AZ
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21, Dave Barr <=