RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems

To: <dave@nk7z.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems
From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 01:25:04 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
If RM11708 passes, and it looks like it will, the JT65 guys will look back on RTTY contest interference as "the good old days."

The worst case is that the upper band segment fills up with the pactor 4 modems and then RTTY, PSK and JT65 will all be looking for new homes - south in the band toward the CW guys.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: David Cole
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 1:13 AM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems

A note Joe:

A bit ago you were saying that these modes could not be heard...  Now we
can even ID them by ear...

--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 20:41 -0500, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Neither JT65, JT9, PSK31, PSK63, nor PSK125 sound like "random noise".
All have a distinctive "sound" and are clearly identifiable on a
waterfall or spectrum display.  It should even be possible to make an
informed guess as to the mode just based on the frequency - the
"center of activity" for each digital mode is published just about
everywhere except in the contest rules.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-01-05 8:19 PM, Jeff Stai wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> > wrote:
>
>>   ... and what is a "hoot" about good operating practice or have
>> RTTY operators forgotten their manners?
>>
>
> "QRL? in their mode"
>
> In other words, given that all digital modes are permitted within the
> spectrum allocated to digital modes, and someone may be listening to a
> transmission I can't hear, and if I can't hear it I don't know their > mode,
> you basically suggested that in order for me to begin transmitting a
> digital signal, by good operating practice I should toss out a QRL? in > all > possible modes first - presumably including modes that require > proprietary
> modems costing thousands of dollars. That's kind of a hoot.
>
> To bring it back, if we all took the position and "if it sounds like > more
> than random noise it is a signal" then if I send out a RTTY QRL? and you
> make a noise in JT-something (guessing I sent a QRL? because what else
> would I do?), I should be able to take that as a "yes" and move on. Good
> manners.
>
> 73 jeff wk6i
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>