RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Director response

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Director response
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:22:10 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Nov 26, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

>> 
>> The CURRENT regs already have that "unspecified code" language in
>> 97.307. The ARRL proposal does not have a "drafting error".
> 
> That is *incorrect*.  97.307(f)(3) currently says:
> 
> (3) Only a RTTY or data emission using a specified digital code listed in 
> §97.309(a) of this part may be transmitted. The symbol rate must not exceed 
> 300 bauds, or for frequency-shift keying, the frequency shift between mark 
> and space must not exceed 1 kHz.

The Appendix in ARRL's petition supports what Joe just said.

The copy I have of Part 97 (published ARRL 2007) says the same thing.

Has 97.307 been changed since then?

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>