RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users

To: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:18:55 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Nov 24, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:

> 1. automatic stations are routinely operating outside the subbands specified 
> in 97.221 (cite http://www.winlink.org/guidelines )
> 
> 2. automatic stations are not required to deploy busy frequency detectors, 
> and as a result can QRM ongoing QSOs
> 
> 3. the proposed increase in allowable bandwidth to 2800 hertz would 
> dramatically increase the QRM caused by automatic stations not
> equipped with a busy frequency detector
> 
> 4. the proposed permission of unspecified digital codes would prevent 
> identification of automatic stations operating outside the
> subbands specified in 97.221


Nice, clean and logical, Dave.

(But also bear in mind that the FCC Commissioners are not engineers but 
lawyers. :-).

73
Chen, W7AY


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>