From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stan
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:19 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708
> have all been developed under the current bandwidth "limitations."
That's part of the problem. Without these limitations we can realize
modes nobody thought of till today.
> Co-existance has not been "proven in the rest of the world" as use
> of wider modes has been limited by the number of licensees in the
> rest of the world
Nonsense. Ham density in many countries is much higher than in the
US. Even more when taken into account that most technicians are
active on VHF/UHF only.
> Winlink and PACTOR III/IV are a blight on amateur radio and should
This all seems to be a private campaign of a few against Winlink/Pactor rather
than supporting the future of ham radio.
This proposal was well defined by experts from ARRL with a more global
future oriented view helping experimenters to develop new modes.
That's ham radio!
Support our league, guys.
Stan
_________________________________________________________
Stan,
Do you have a real call sign? >>>> Having one really helps to build
bona fides here.<<<
I'm WB2RHM, my name is really Ben, I am listed on QRZ and the FCC DB.
Do you have a call sign that really belongs to a real ham radio
operator?........... and why are you hiding behind an anonymous ISP
system id................
Stan, just curious........... WB2RHM
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|