Everything that W4TV, W7AY and AA6YQ said should just
about cover it for you Peter. The backers of the proposal at
the league are all involved with Winlink one way or another
and the league has adopted Winlink as their emcomm
standard.
Ron
K0IDT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>
To: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Cc: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
with Winlink, search 'Winlink wants your frequencies" for the last
time this came around under 'band segmentation by bandwidth'.
Unless PIII unleashed all over the cw/digital band segments is your
idea of a good thing it needs to be killed in it's present form. My
OK, help me (us) out here. The League will say "no, that's not what
this is about" whether it is or not, so what could they point to to
make what they say true?
I share your concern about turning all HF digital bands over to
SailMail, but we need to be ready with counter-arguments as well.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|