I'd be up for a petition type thing, however, I'm not sure signatures from out
of the country would hold much weight, perhaps some comments from groups such
as the RSGB or DARC or other countries amateur radio groups would carry more
weight....
73, Jamie WW3S
On 10/19/2013 1:08:10 PM, Kok Chen (chen@mac.com) wrote:
> By the way, let me float this to the RTTY community -- do you prefer that
> we submit individual comments to the FCC, or do you prefer that we
> together draft out something for interested parties to sign (and tout their
> own credentials, if need be).
>
> I know that there is already at least one effort to collect as much
> documentation as possible to counter
> ARRL's lame idea. I have been in the CC of emails of such activity, and have
> also participated in the private discussions.
>
> If a collective, well thought out comment is publish before any FCC deadline,
> would you prefer to sign that instead of submitting your own?
>
> I have not floated this idea to anyone yet, I am interested in what the
> community prefers, and we'll
> see if the folks who are already drafting a comment (let's call them "the
> usual suspects" of RTTY HI HI) would be willing to let others add their names.
>
> BTW, the signatures do not have to be limited US licensed hams, since QRM can
> travel far and wide and affect everybody, including SWL.
>
> 73
> Chen, W7AY
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> -----
> No virus found%2
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|