RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements
From: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:50:05 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I'm pretty happy with the 3 Microkeyer devices I have, and NONE send "slow" 
rtty......

    
On 10/1/2013 7:15:54 PM, Jim Preston (jpreston1@cox.net) wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> MicroHam interfaces are not responsible for "slow RTTY". I use the
> microKEYER, and it sends normal FSK RTTY. The microKEYER II shouldmeet
> all of your requirements.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Jim N6VH
> 
> 
> On 10/1/2013 1:58 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
> > I have simple requirements but I
> can't find a vendor that can meet them all.
> >
> > o single USB cable from PC to box
> > o built-in sound device
> > o single cable to radio (multiple heads for connections not on
> > accessory connector like CI-V)
> > o ability to transmit FSK RTTY at 45.45 (note decimal) and 75 baud
> >
> > Yes, I'm
> aware of the FSK vs AFSK thing and like FSK anyway so please
> >
> don't send a message telling me to "forget FSK".
> >
> > I want simple cabling and not have to switch cables around to move
> > from phone to RTTY to CW to PSK (or other audio modes).
> >
> > Sadly, the RigExpert doesn't
> meet the qualifications because it
> > doesn't do 75 baud without using MixW (in fact, it won't support 45.45
> > baud with MMTTY unless you use
> RE's hacked EXTFSK) - big
> > disappointment there since I actually had one until I returned it.
> >
> > SignalLink
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>