Same Thing here. I didn't see any RTTY when I have checked for it. So I
have done only psk31 QSOs. Most operators where using causal PSK macros.
So I must have looked strange with my contest one. Hi.
We has set up a station for digi/cw operations. Unfortunatley no one
operated in cw. Next year, I'll try to get some skilled cw operators. My
station underperformed with only psk31 and a G5RV in a tree.
73, Martin VE2NMB
2013/7/4 k0bx@arrl.net <k0bx@arrl.net>
> I tried RTTY on FD for several years and it was just not worth the
> effort. 20 meter CW and SSB were the money stations for number of QSO's
> during FD.
> I would like to see something like they do for natural power, 10 QSO's and
> you get 100 points. Or maybe just 100 point for showing off a digital mode.
>
> Joe K0BX
>
>
> #1 Honor Roll Mixed
> Honor Roll RTTY
>
>
> Stop the insanity!
> Please do not add me to any distribution lists (Joke, Stories or Junk)
> without my permission.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
> To: Mike N8MR <n8mr@hotmail.com>; "rtty@contesting.com" <
> rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 7:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital: PSK vs RTTY
>
>
> I found the same thing.
>
> I had a few club members express interest in operating PSK on FD. We were
> class 5A. I set up one computer with my DigiKeyer interface to run both PSK
> and RTTY with a radio I loaned for the effort that was operated on 40-20-15
> meters. In the end, I was the only operator to use either mode and I had
> only 27 digital contacts in a couple hours of operating. 20 PSK and 7
> RTTY. There were LOTS of PSK signals during the day, but we had 20M
> antenna problems and our tribander was in use by a voice operator most of
> the time I was there to operate. We had a total of about 950 QSO's, so 27
> digital is nothing to brag about. I spent maybe 2 operating hours to get
> those 27 QSOs spread out over both days. The remainder of our QSO's were
> split almost evenly between CW and phone.
>
> What I did find is that the vast majority of the PSK operators were very
> poor compared to the RTTY operators in a typical contest. Hideously long
> exchanges (HI K2AE K2AE PLEASE COPY 599 2E 2E IN LAX LAX) and uselessly
> long goodbye messages (K2AE GOODBYE AND GOOD LUCK IN THE CONTEST HAPPY FD
> 73 DE K6LMNOP). That coupled with really long times to answer my response
> after I answered their CQ , and I was very happy that RTTY contest
> operators are largely in a different class.
>
> In our club, there are but a few contesters and many of the FD operators
> are Techs using the opportunity to operate on HF outside of 10M. I'd be
> interested in hearing if that's typical of other operations.
>
> Al
> AB2ZY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike N8MR
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 6:11 AM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] Field Day Digital: PSK vs RTTY
>
> Hello All,
>
> For the 4th year in a row, our local amateur radio club set up a separate
> digital station for Field Day. We've heard that RTTY is the most popular
> digital mode for Field Day, but this year, we found far more PSK31 signals
> than RTTY signals. We listened for PSK31 at x.070 and RTTY from x.080 to
> x.100 on 40, 20 and 15 Meters.
>
> Is PSK31 the more popular digital mode for Field Day?
>
> What is a good average total QSO count for a digital station on Field Day?
>
> 73,
> Mike, N8MR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|