RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Intentional QRM on 7O6T 17M

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Intentional QRM on 7O6T 17M
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:28:21 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Congrats.  Try it from the West.......... On Rtty we have to get through 
the EU and the East Coast Walls.

Most logging software will set the split if it is spotted that way.  
Most of the problems were guys tuning and forgetting which vfo they were 
transmitting on or left to go work something else and came back and 
forgot to hit the split.   The flagrant jamming has gone away for the 
most part on 17.

I use Commcat and really like it.

To each his own.



Mike W0MU

W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com
Http://www.w0mu.com


On 5/13/2012 5:19 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
> Just worked 7O6T on 17m - 3 calls.  I was definitely lucky in my frequency 
> selection, but would have missed the QSO except that I happen to catch my 
> call on the dx reply during breaks in UP UP UP bullshit.  Everyone should use 
> DXlab - it even sets your split tx frequency for you!
>
> Which is really worse: stations that (usually) make the honest mistake of 
> forgetting to press split but only transmit while the dx station is 
> listening, or the DX cop morons that call while the DX station is 
> transmitting?  On SSB they don't even seem to spend any time trying to work 
> the DX.  They spend time chatting amongst themselves  on the DX frequency 
> trading what they think are snarky comments.
>
> I got them on all 3 modes with 4 QSO's on 2 bands - 20 and 17.  I'm perfectly 
> happy with that!
>
> Al
> AB2ZY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Jarrett
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 4:57 PM
> To: RTTY@contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] Intentional QRM on 7O6T 17M
>
>
> I also witnessed the NA NA NA plus the song and bs crap, etc.  Disgusting.
>
> Here in Central VA the offender was strong on my dipole.  I am curious if any 
> others who heard this crap were able to determine a general direction with a 
> directional antenna.
>
> The QYF suggestion is not the answer.  It worked poorly for the Bouvet 
> operation and other operations where it was used.  I remember the experience 
> vividly.
>
> The real answer is to nail the sucker, but that may be difficult unless we 
> can identify a general area where the signal came from, and, then, we will 
> have to get lucky to find the person.  I suspect a repeat offender that will 
> show up often.
>
> Good luck to those still needing 7O on rtty.  I am sure the ops are 
> overwhelmed by the numbers from EU with better prop.
>
> 73, Steve, K4FJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>