To: | RTTYReflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy) |
From: | Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> |
Date: | Sun, 13 May 2012 14:21:28 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
On May 13, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Bill Turner wrote: > And those "taps" would likely send you to jail, although I sympathize with > your feelings. I agree. Disbaring them from the DXCC program would probably cause them more angst than "Guido's Hammer." The problem, even if the ARRL is willing to disbar someone, is how do you prove a violation. I'll bet the board of directors won't touch it with a ten foot SP. (Guido, obviously won't need much proof :-). 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Intentional QRM on 7O6T 17M, Bill Turner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy), Jerry Flanders |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy), Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy), Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |