RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
From: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:51:41 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The one problem with online "logs" is that the DX could have busted a 
call and logged me instead of W1MU or W9MU.  In your scenario I would be 
penalized because they busted the contact.

I don't know how many people feel the need to work DX peditions multiple 
times when they know they have a solid contact.

W0MU

On 8/12/2011 4:17 AM, Shelby Summerville wrote:
> K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of
> Conduct it might help  http://dx-code.org/";
>
> As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying" attempts to
> stay at the top of the Honor Roll exists, the DX Code of Conduct is not
> applicapable! For the few that "work them and shut up", many, many more try
> and work them on as many bands/modes as possible. I await the day a "rare"
> DXpedition, that has online log availability, and publishes their operating
> style, penalizes duplicate band callers by removing all of their other
> contacts? If one is sure that they are in the online log, I see absolutely
> no reason for another attempt, on the same band. In the case of a new
> entity, "once per band/mode" should be enforced? I also believe that the DX
> has most of the responsibility of "controlling the pileup"?
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>