RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial
From: DONALD A HILL <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:19:11 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I used to notice that running a large SCP file would slow down my Win98 
machine.  But since both machines are now XP, I doubt I would have that 
problem. 

I think the problem with using an SCP file with all calls - SSB, CW and RTTY 
would be that when a partial is trying to be decided upon, there would be way 
more options available than if using a RTTY-only file.  The chances of guessing 
at the wrong call would great increase.

Just a thought...

73, Don AA5AU



--- On Wed, 3/3/10, Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com> wrote:

> From: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
> Subject: [RTTY] Super Check Partial
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 9:12 AM
> For those of you that use SCP (Super
> Check Partial) and choose to use the
> RTTY-only version, what is your reason for not using the
> full version that
> includes calls from contests of all three modes?
> 
> Ed - W0YK
> -----------------------------------------------
> Ed Muns
> Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com 
> FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>