I don't recall these reports about excessive errors at least in the 2000 test
in which I took part.
Bill do you have a source? Probably in the archives I would think.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:12:29 -0800
>
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:45:17 -0600, "Robert Chudek - K0RC"
><k0rc@citlink.net> wrote:
>
>>Bill, sorry, you recall wrong. As the contest sponsor and receiver of scores
>>and
>>soapbox comments, there were no complaints about excessive errors. To the
>>contrary, the only complaints were the exchanges zipped across the screen so
>>fast the operators were not used to the quick pace of TX, RX, and LOG.
>>Please don't manufacture (false) facts to support your beliefs.
>
>REPLY:
>
>I take great offense to your slander above. I remember what I heard
>quite well and I stand by my comments. There WERE observations that
>the errors were more numerous at high speed. You owe me an apology.
>
>73, Bill W6WRT
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
>
>
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|