RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests

To: "'Dallmeier, Walter'" <walter.dallmeier@dl4rck.de>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests
From: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Reply-to: w0yk@msn.com
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:29:28 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
My interpretation of this poll is that the 67 respondents are split yes/no.
That doesn't necessarily extend to the RTTY community or the larger
community of people who care about what happens on 160 meters.

It is not practical to make a useful poll of a community.  However,
soliciting rationale from people as to why they are for or against a given
topic can help determine the factors that lead to a more objective decision.

Ed - W0YK

-----------------------------------------------
Ed Muns
Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com 
FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dallmeier, Walter
> Sent: Saturday, 31 October, 2009 04:06
> To: rtty@contesting.com; drcg@drcg.de
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests
> 
> Hello,
> 
> here the summary of the Poll "Top Band 160m RTTY Contesting" 
> with 67 votes after 3 days.
> The result is around 50/50 of Yes/No.
> 
> It seems that the RTTY community is pretty evenly split about 
> this question.
> More information at www.drcg.de .
> 
> 
> vy 73, de Walter, DL4RCK, DL4R
> 
> Walter Dallmeier
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Dallmeier, Walter [mailto:walter.dallmeier@dl4rck.de]
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2009 20:45
> > An: rtty@contesting.com; drcg@drcg.de
> > Betreff: [drcg] [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I create a poll for "Top Band 160m RTTY Contesting".
> > Feel free to vote there and watch the result.
> > 
> > Vote at: www.drcg.de
> > 
> > 
> > 73 de Walter, DL4RCK, DL4R
> > 
> > Walter Dallmeier
> > Email: walter.dallmeier@dl4rck.de
> > http://www.dl4rck.de
> > http://www.rckrtty.de
> > http://www.rcklog.de
> > http://www.drcg.de
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: rtty-bounces@contesting.com 
> > > [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]
> > > Im Auftrag von Thorvaldur Stefansson
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2009 12:34
> > > An: w0yk@msn.com
> > > Cc: topband@contesting.com; RTTY Reflector
> > > Betreff: Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests
> > >
> > > I vote NO.
> > >
> > > I would like 160 meters to be completely free of 
> contesting and SSB 
> > > - CW only.
> > >
> > > 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect.
> > >
> > > 73
> > >
> > > Thor, TF4M
> > > http://tf4m.com/archives/tag/the-king
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2009/10/26 Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
> > >
> > > > Most (all?) RTTY contests prohibit operation on 160 
> meters.  Yet, 
> > > > a
> > > number
> > > > of RTTY contesters have asked that it be added.  I'd 
> like to hear
> > > your
> > > > thoughts on this topic, pro and con.  In particular, 
> I'm thinking
> > > about the
> > > > CQ WPX RTTY and CQ WW RTTY contests.
> > > >
> > > > Ed - W0YK
> > > > CQ RTTY Contest Director
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------
> > > > Ed Muns
> > > > Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com FaceBook - 
> > > > www.facebook.com/munsvineyard
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Topband mailing list
> > > > Topband@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RTTY mailing list
> > > RTTY@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>