I think both you and Tom, W7WHY have valid points, Bill from my angle anyhow.
I have found that it works best for me putting the station I'm working callsign
on
both the front and back. As mentioned, several normally are calling so I have
fewer
repeats and fewer incidents of two or three stations thinking I am working them.
I change my macros as I go through the contest. I normally have rough band
conditions and being a low profile station, I normally struggle with contacts.
If the band is poor, I will also give my report x3, ie; W7WHY 599 001 001 001
W7WHY. I also get fewer repeats. If sending my number one more time gets the
job done, it beats sending it 3 or 4 more times by itself. Is this a bad
thing? Some may thing so.
If the band gets much better and I have good propagation, I drop one of the
three. I could not agree more, Bill. Trying to figure it out is half the fun.
Is there a perfect macro? I'm still learning, watching, and reading trying to
find them. I have learned plenty and feel MY macros are much better than they
were a few years ago. I appreciate these discussions on this reflector from
both sides and I appreciate Dick's point of view as everyone elses.
I will never break any records but I am in this to have fun. I make notes of
those stations whom could use a bit of advice but I don't have all the answers
myself. I often times hit the wrong F-key and it seems like no matter how well
I mark my keyboard, I will do it every contest. I appreciate the spacing
information between callsigns and reports, which makes perfect sense. I plan on
doing that myself. I learn from each and every contest and I appreciate all
the contacts and all the suggestions. There is lots of different software out
there and I assume they each play a bit differently. These macro discussions
surface after every major contest but I think anyone new on the reflector would
find some value in it, including someone like myself who has been playing
around with RTTY for a few years. I think I have seen here already where one
new person has benefited from this discussion, or so was written.
73,
Phil
KL8DX
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Bill, W6WRT <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bill, W6WRT <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Good Observations in RTTY RU
To: "Dick-w0raa" <w0raa@comcast.net>
Cc: "Steve **KT0DX**" <kt0dx@comcast.net>, "Rtty Contesting Reflector"
<rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 7:27 PM
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:34:07 -0700, "Dick-w0raa"
<w0raa@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
>I had stations send me the following: W0RAA 599 AL AL W0RAA. Makes no
>sense.
REPLY:
Maybe, maybe not.
I send it that way because often there are two or more stations
calling me and I want to be sure everyone knows which one I am sending
it to. If I send your call only once like this W0RAA 599 CA CA W6WRT
it is likely your call will get buried by other stations who are still
calling me. Sending it twice improves the chances of everybody knowing
who I am working.
There is no one way of doing it which fits all situations. Over a
period of time you will get a feel for what works best, i.e., fewest
requests for a repeat. Trying to figure it out is half the fun.
Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|