Peter Laws wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 03:49, Sartwell <sartwell@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> never do we sweep around our own back door. [DID YOU DO EVERYTHING EXACTLY
>> AS THE OTHER OPERATORS MIGHT THINK YOU SHOULD?} Stop spending all of your
>
> Absolutely!!! :-)
>
>
> The only thing that really bugs me (tho' not enough to take notes and
> send email) are the few stations that would answer a CQ with their
> exchange. Confusing at the very least, both to the CQer and to anyone
> trying to S&P on the CQer.
>
> Long exchanges aren't that big a deal, though some were ... well ...
> excessive.
>
> But you know how it is: the more they operate, the shorter their
> macros will get.
Agree with all of the above. The ones that send the exchange in response
to CQ really threw me - I'd send my exchange and then wonder what they
were going to do next. Some of them didn't do anything, leaving me
wondering if I'd made a Q or not. I logged them anyway.
~Iain / N6ML
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|