To: | <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] 160 |
From: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:42:32 -0500 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
NP3D writes: > There is plenty of space, we (RTTYers) just need 20 KHz or so > around 1808. I am sure that here is a high time to include > 160 meters RTTY into NAQP RTTY, to start with and see how it > goes... I do not think that organizers of NAQP are willing to > add 160 meters though. This is exactly the problem ... ARRL 160 has been there for 30+ years and generally fills the band from 1800 to 1875 +/- from before sunset on the US east coast until nearly sunrise on the west coast. Now RTTY wants the bottom 20 KHz of the band from 0000Z for some "new" contest that expands t0 160 meters. This is complete nonsense ... if RTTY wants to expand to 160, expand the existing RTTY contests that don't conflict with one of only two major 160 meter CW only events. Don't get on 160 with RTTY in the middle of a major CW contest - that is the very essence of intentional interference. Of course this just shows how badly the FCC screwed up when they opened 160 to RTTY. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] 160, Andrei Stchislenok |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] 160, Bill Tippett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 160, Andrei Stchislenok |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 160, Jim McDonald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |