To: | <RTTY@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] This was NOT ARRL's idea or proposal.... |
From: | "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:35:49 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@rac.ca> wrote:"You can rest assured there will be digital signals above 3600kHz" True, however it may very difficult to get "stateside" multipliers there? Kindasorta like operation above 21.100...US stations are limited to "not more than 200 watts", between 21.100-21.200, while the rest of the world is not? Regardless, I suspect that it will be possible, for any/all US stations, to operate below 3600, without running out of stations to work? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] This was NOT ARRL's idea or proposal...., Julio VE3FH |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] This was NOT ARRL's idea or proposal...., Robert Chudek - KØRC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] This was NOT ARRL's idea or proposal...., Julio VE3FH |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] This was NOT ARRL's idea or proposal...., Robert Chudek - KØRC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |