RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY 2006 VK4UC SOAB HP

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY 2006 VK4UC SOAB HP
From: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:02:03 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
In many cases we "concentrate" on those 1 (and 2) point qso's out of 
necissity due to poor propagation. From my QTH Europe was almost 
nonexistant. Most of my 3 point QSO's were South America and JA. Believe 
me, I would have much preferred more 3 pointers, but it just didn't happen.

73,

Jim N6VH

Tyler Stewart wrote:
> Yes, on CQWW RTTY there are a lot more multipliers due to the states and
> generally  lower total QSO numbers, which means that working multipliers is
> not nearly as important on RTTY as the other modes.  A lot of guys are also
> lured into the 1 point stateside QSOs when they should be concentrating on 3
> point DX. 
> 
> Ty K3MM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>Judging from some of the qso vs score reports, 
> 
> there may be some focus on working each like a domestic contest at 
> the expense of listening for DX.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of John Cashen
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 6:44 PM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY 2006 VK4UC SOAB HP
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>