RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] An interesting experiment

To: RTTY@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] An interesting experiment
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:36:54 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hi Bill,

Oh, I was just trying to make a point albeit my wife did 
offer the suggestion. Separate classes are clearly needed
(eg. paper -vs- computer) and I was providing a 'visual'
aid.

Regards,

Phil 

-----

Quoting Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>:

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> 
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:33:38 -0400, you wrote:
> 
> 
> >"Why bother classifying the stations. The high scoring
> >guys need computers to track all their points. Use two
> >classes.. computer submissions and paper submissions?"
> 
> ------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------
> 
> Since this is the RTTY reflector, I should point out that nearly all
> of us use computers to send and receive RTTY during contests. Going to
> paper logs would be a step back for all of us, wouldn't it?
> 
> Or maybe you were kidding. :-)
> 
> Bill, W6WRT
> 




_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>