RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse

To: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:52:42 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
You say "not necessarily", but I don't see any disagreement. In your
example, when one TX is on, so is the other RX. With SO1R you can
either be in TX mode or RX mode but not both. 

Please clarify.

Bill, W6WRT



------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:42:36 +0000, you wrote:

>
>
>Bill,
>Not necessarily true.  When I do RTTY SO2R, more often than not, I 
>alternate CQs on 2 bands.  As soon as R1 goes into rcve, R2 starts 
>CQing.  I've found it more productive than listening on the second 
>band.  This is unique to RTTY.  Besides the fact you don't need to 
>listen to anything on RTTY, there's really no way to hold 2 freqs on CW 
>or SSB.
>73,
>Barry
>> Quoting Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>:
>>
>>   
>>> If the RX is off when the TX is on, it's SO1R. The advantage of SO2R
>>> is listening while transmitting.
>>>
>>> Bill, W6WRT
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>>   
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>