RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY

To: IronmanY2K@triathlete.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY
From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:26:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Aug 14, 2005, at 6:59 PM, IronmanY2k wrote:

> Any other thoughts on this?

The problem with 160m RTTY is the same problem with 40m and 80m  
packet radio. On 160m, signals arrive via multiple propagation paths  
causing inter-symbol interference. The solution is to reduce the  
symbol rate. You might have more success on 160m if you lowered the  
symbol rate to 20-30 baud from 45 baud for standard 60 wpm RTTY.


Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>