RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] XE RTTY Contest

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] XE RTTY Contest
From: Scott Nichols <snichols@mvosprey.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:42:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I don't think this is correct...With a few exceptions, ARRL and CQ sponsored
contests are the only ones that place "assisted" op's into "multi-op" or
"assisted" categories...I think this issue came up last year, with the
general consensus being that packet/telnet is allowed for everyone in the XE
RTTY contest...

C U on the screen this weekend ...

Scott VE1OP


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: "NB1B" <nb1b@comcast.net>
Cc: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] XE RTTY Contest


> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:40:29 -0500, NB1B wrote:
>
> >The XE RTTY Contest this weekend- can packet be used?  There is no Multi
> >type entries, but nothing is stated about packet.
> ___________________________________________________________
>
> The rules 'should' be more specific, but I think it's generally agreed
> that packet constitutes an assisted, i.e. multioperator, category.
>
> -- 
> Bill, W6WRT
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 2/3/2005
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>