On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0600 (CST), Peter Laws wrote:
>It *is* meaningless and we should petition the organizers to drop it or,
>better yet, add some other bit of info (e.g., year first licensed, as in
>the ARRL November Sweepstakes).
___________________________________________________________
I wish there was a good way to require a 'real' RST. IOW, a log full
of nothing but sent 599 would be DQ'd. Trouble is, someone would
probably devise a random RST generator script to get around it. Sigh.
--
Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|