To: | <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero" |
From: | "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
Date: | Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:19:44 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I'm not sure when things changed, but they sure did. Nowdays, the zero
and the "O" are differentiated by their thickness. A zero is skinny, an
"O" is fat. 0O - which is which? There is a True Type font called Andale Mono which has a slashed zero. If you don't have it laying around, email me offline and I'll see what I can do. -- Bill W6WRT ----- Original Message ----- From: <Russmill47@aol.com> To: <llindblom@juno.com>; <TCG@K4RO.net>; <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:31 PM Subject: Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero" When did things change? I'm just getting back to RTTY after a slight break
_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero", Russmill47 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Aw: [RTTY] OK RTTY Rule change!, dk3vn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero", Russmill47 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero", Kok Chen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |