Thanks to all for your interest in QTC traffic.
My first remark was aimed at those hams, mainly US and Canadian
who hand out some contest points, never intend to send a log,
but refuse to accept QTCs.
For sure all stations intending to submit a log must faithfully
log all QTCs or abstain from QTC traffic entirely.
73 de Goetz
dj3iw@t-online.de
----- Original Message -----
From: <f6irf@free.fr>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them
> Goetz,
> Are you sure about this?
> To be honnest I have serious doubts !
>
>
> The rule states that
> "Every QTC that was correctly transferred, counts one point for the sender
and
> one point for the receiver."
>
> 1) For me, it means that everybody sending a log should include QTC's
otherwise
> they will not be counted for the sender...
> 2) the question remains for stations not sending a log...
>
> However, if I was the corrector , I would not count unverifiable QTC's...
too
> easy isn't it?
>
> To be checked with DL6RAI...
> Pat
>
>
>
>
> [WriteLog] Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them
> from [DJ3IW Goetz] [Permanent Link][Original]
>
> To: "WriteLog" <writelog@contesting.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
> Subject: [WriteLog] Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them
> From: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:55:28 -0000
> List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
>
> And one more comment about QTCs.
>
> Even if you are not inclined to join the "frenzy" of exchanging QTCs,
> PLEASE if someone offers you QTCs (from another continent of course)
> ACCEPT them, give the other station a QSL and then forget about it.
> It doesn't bother you but helps the other station.
>
> 73 de Goetz
> dj3iw@t-online.de
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|