RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth

To: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth
From: <gdadx2@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:06:44 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
MT-63 isn't obnoxious.  It is a fun mode and normally found above 14.000.
Those auto-pactor MSO's  are the real interference, not MT63.

WB4M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth


> > I think this is a false alarm.  As it is now, the PIII stations could
> legally
> > operate down in the PSK and RTTY segments, and PII MBO's already do.
> > This would add restrictions to that.  It also moves that most obnoxious
of
> > digital modes, MT63, out of the narrow band area.
>
> I tend to agree, as long as the ones in the RTTY area don't multiply much.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>