To: | <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again! |
From: | Marty Tippin <martyt@pobox.com> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:20:46 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
It's pointless to argue this SO2R thing for long, but... I believe that there is a significant advantage held by a good SO2R operator, particularly in RTTY contests and to a much lesser degree in CW and phone contests. The pacing of a RTTY contest and the exchanges involved allows for most of the good SO2R operators to actually RUN on two frequencies at the same time - simply use the lock-out control in WriteLog and you'll never transmit two signals at the same time. And it's easy to adjust your messages so that the CQ is about the same length as the exchange. All you have to do is get into the rhythm of calling CQ on one radio while listening to an incoming exchange on the other - takes a little practice but isn't that hard to master. To me, the ability to seamlessly run two frequencies at the same time, even if only one signal is on the air at a time, is what makes it impossible for the one-radio guys to compete with SO2R. Perhaps a band change rule for single ops would level the playing field a bit - maybe something like 12 band changes per hour - that's way more than the average single op would need, but few enough to make the SO2R guys either demand their own category or be more sly in how they do their operating. -NW0L At 12:35 PM 1/9/2004, wx4tm@tm-moore.com wrote: Suggestion: how's about an article on how easily the SO2R ops blow away the competition.. Look at a couple of years worth of contest scores and compare the highest SO2R scores to the highest SO1R scores (in high and low power categories) to show that the best SO2R scores average 1/4th to 1/3rd higher than the best SO1R scores; that SO2R provides a greater advantage than by moving up to the High Power category (compare SO1R high power to SO2R low power scores which shows that SO2R LP wins over SO1R HP almost every time); and, why contest committees, led by the ARRL, continue to refuse to acknowledge the SO2R advantage, including published admissions by top SO2R ops that it is a fantastic, though somewhat complicated and costly advantage to obtain. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again!, WI8W |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again!, George Johnson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again!, WA9ALS - John |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again!, Tom Osborne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |