Kurt,
Respectfully, (and to keep the record correct here), your comments
about the FCC being, "out of touch", "deranged", "vindictive", and
"destructive", are only your interpretation of some well though out
comments, which did not include anything even close to that line of
thinking...
You may be overreacting to what was said.
73,
Dave,
On 5/10/22 10:19, KD7JYK DM09 wrote:
You said “I might be off base here, but I don't see any downside to
petitioning the FCC to rethink emissions limits to benefit hams.”
I would hate to see the “harmful interference” limitation removed from
some
of the current regulations even though it’s open to interpretation.
Is the FCC so out of touch, so deranged, so vindictive and destructive,
that merely mentioning a regulation may no longer be adequate, and
should be reviewed for current conditions, the response would be, "You
know what? FINE. NO MORE REGULATIONS! Y'all can just suck it!!"?
Why would multiple groups addressing the same issue result in
regulations being removed?
What petition was suggested to remove any current regulations regarding
harmful interference?
What mentality am I missing here?
Kurt
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|