Re: [RFI] WallyHome?

[Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>]

So Microsoft now gets to define English usage as well as set the 
criteria for software design!?
People may be "titled" (e.g., "Sir" somebody or other; "Lord" 
Muckamuck). Written works are "entitled." Been that way ever since I 
learned to read and write.
73

Alan NV8A


On 09/01/14 07:40 pm, Paul Christensen wrote:
> The Associated Press Stylebook (AP) disagrees as does The Microsoft
> Manual of Style for Technical Publications. Those are just two quick
> sources I found. I'm not sure as to the authority of the grammarist
> site, but the majority of English professors would object to the FCC's
> use of the rd. -5 points for incorrect usage!
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Howard Lester
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 7:25 PM
> To: Group RFI
> Subject: Re: [RFI] WallyHome?
>
> > From the site grammarist.com:
> "When they are synonymous with named or called, there is no substantive
> difference between entitled and titled. Some people object to this use
> entitled, but the objection is baseless. The use of entitled to mean named
> goes back centuries, and entitled was in fact the preferred term until
> recently."
>
> So this time, at least, the Gov't agency did get it right. :-)
>
> Howard N7SO
>
>
> "The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) has released a
> > technical report *entitled*, "Measurements of Environmental
> > Electromagnetic
> > Fields at Amateur Radio Stations."
> >
> > It scares me that a U.S. Government agency cannot distinguish between the
> > words "titled," and "entitled."
> >
> > Paul, W9AC
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi