RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] WallyHome?

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] WallyHome?
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:19:17 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 9/1/2014 7:25 PM, Howard Lester wrote:
 From the site grammarist.com:

Used to be, entitled was an active verb meaning, to giving title or referring to giving title. IE, the article was entitled.


73

Roger (K8RI)


"When they are synonymous with named or called, there is no substantive
difference between entitled and titled. Some people object to this use
entitled, but the objection is baseless. The use of entitled to mean named
goes back centuries, and entitled was in fact the preferred term until
recently."

So this time, at least, the Gov't agency did get it right.   :-)

Howard N7SO


"The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) has released a
technical report *entitled*, "Measurements of Environmental Electromagnetic
Fields at Amateur Radio Stations."

It scares me that a U.S. Government agency cannot distinguish between the
words "titled," and "entitled."

Paul, W9AC

​

​
​

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>