RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...

To: "RFI@contesting.com" <RFI@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...
From: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Reply-to: qrv@kd4e.com
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:45:48 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
It appears to be a case of fraud & should be addressed by the
appropriate Federal agencies (FCC, FEC, etc.).

If enough people are harmed, directly or indirectly, a class-
action lawsuit may also result.

When it costs them enough they'll knock off the nonsense -
the Chinese want to sell products made in their factories -
if specific factories and/or products are blocked it will
make a difference. It has happened before.

David KD4E

The unit we tested had the FCC logo on it, even though it was 58 dB
over the noise limits.

It also has a CE mark on it, and there are already complaints being
brought in Europe.

Under the US rules, the FCC does not test any equipment to authorize
it.  Even certification is based on manufacturer-supplied test data.
In the case of lighting devices, the equipment is "verified," meaning
that the manufacturer is required to test the design before marketing
it.

Ed Hare, W1RFI



--

David (NOT Dave) Colburn, KD4E - Nevils, Georgia USA

Safe & Secure Search Engine: duckduckgo.com

Android for Hams: groups.yahoo.com/group/hamdroid
Creative Tech: groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver
Raspi Alternative: groups.yahoo.com/group/beagleboneblack/

Restored to design-spec at Heaven's gate 1Cor15:22
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>