To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... |
From: | Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:43:03 -0400 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On 03/21/2014 02:48 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: > Do you really think we need more gov't to be involved with inspecting > and testing EVERY item that is made so that it does not hurt people, > cause interference and on and on and on. We would never see another > product brought to market. > > We don't live in a perfect world and expecting something like this with > a gov't that is 17trillion in the hole is crazy. Proactively having the government check everything does seem impractical, indeed. However, putting rules in place that oblige manufacturers and/or importers to replace faulty equipment at their expense (instead of stiffing the consumers) might be a good deterrent to people sticking FCC stickers on untested equipment... -- All rights reversed. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39, David Cole |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39, Tom Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC..., W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC..., Roger D Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |